Re: MonetDB test says that PostgreSQL often has errors or missing results
От | Mark Wong |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MonetDB test says that PostgreSQL often has errors or missing results |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 70c01d1d1001201002h254c8ed0ye34c59d47d97c2fe@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MonetDB test says that PostgreSQL often has errors or missing results (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: MonetDB test says that PostgreSQL often has errors
or missing results
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> >> Actually, the report which MonetDB has published I believe is illegal. >> If they're not running it through the TPC, they can't claim it's a >> "TPCH" result. >> > > I just resisted getting into that but now you've set me off again. > Presumably they're using the public TPC-H data and query generator > distributed by the TPC, and there's certainly plenty of other unofficial > reports of results using that floating around. Where I think they really > crossed the line here is using that kit to produce unaudited results, and > then publishing results that included comparisons against a competitor, > which is clearly not what the TPC intends you to do here. What the TPC provides isn't really a usable kit. It could be entertaining to see how their kit works. Regards, Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: