Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
От | Mark Wong |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 70c01d1d0812161156k2c348ee7y3b42f019b298e1e1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > Jonah H. Harris wrote: >> >> Well, running an official TPC benchmark is an interesting process. >> First, you have to have a spec-compliant benchmark kit, which we >> don't. > > Well, then the first order of business would be to write a benchmark kit. I > have been thinking for a while that we should make our own maintained > version of the DBT+* suite, or whatever other suite is appropriate. And > then start running it. We're slowing tuning a system for the dbt2 kit in Portland with the hardware from HP. > The rest of this discussion, while interesting, cannot really lead to any > improvements, because none of the results and analyses can be published. > Like, you know, "I have these great insights into important problems, but I > cannot tell you about them." > > Is it possible to write a possibly eventually compliant benchmark kit under > open-source terms? Yes. I believe the only restriction is to not use the kit in a way that competes with the TPC. Using the kits for our developing efforts is ok. Regards, Mark
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: