Re: Performance issues on FK Triggers after replacing a primary column
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance issues on FK Triggers after replacing a primary column |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 704027.1648476426@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance issues on FK Triggers after replacing a primary column (Per Kaminsky <per.kaminsky@hawk-intech.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Per Kaminsky <per.kaminsky@hawk-intech.com> writes: > # ('Trigger for constraint B_firmid_fkey: time=25.592 calls=1000',) > # ('Trigger for constraint B_type_fkey: time=14.899 calls=1000',) > # ('Trigger for constraint B_userid_fkey: time=16.146 calls=1000',) > # ('Trigger for constraint B_version_fkey: time=11.285 calls=1000',) > # ('Trigger for constraint B_common_fkey: time=7.913 calls=1000',) > # ('Trigger for constraint B_shiftinstanceid_fkey: time=8543.369 calls=1000',) > ('Trigger for constraint B_to_A_fkey: time=27246.413 calls=1000',) Sure looks like B_shiftinstanceid_fkey and B_to_A_fkey are running seq scans for lack of any matching index. > The tables have Index on each other. The vacuum can not be called, since all those table modifications are part of onebig transaction to be able to make a rollback on any problem without causing an abnormal data state regarding the program. Hmm, are you dropping and re-adding the reference-side indexes as part of the same transaction that is doing this? I'm too short of caffeine to recall details, but I think there are cases where a newly-made index cannot be used right away. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: