Re: [GENERAL] Queries are taking way longer in 9.6 than 9.5
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Queries are taking way longer in 9.6 than 9.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 70190c66-cf64-4741-1cd7-a6cf08f4101f@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Queries are taking way longer in 9.6 than 9.5 (Ravi Tammineni <rtammineni@partner.aligntech.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Queries are taking way longer in 9.6 than 9.5
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, after looking at the explain plans again, I very much doubt those come from the same query. The reason is the 9.5 plan contains this part: -> HashAggregate (cost=67.54..68.12 rows=192 width=4) Group Key: d.vip_patient_id -> Nested Loop (cost=0.17..67.44 rows=192 width=4) -> Index Scan using unq_user_name on tblcnaccounts ... Index Cond: ((user_name)::text = 'dddddd'::text) -> Index Only Scan using idx_tblcndoctorpatientmap ... Index Cond: (master_user_id = a.master_user_id) while the 9.6 plan does not include anything like that, i.e. there's only a single aggregate at the top level, without any group keys. Also, the SQL query you've provided does not include any GROUP BY clause, so I claim that those plans are from two different queries. regards Tomas -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: