Re: plpython3
От | Nathan Boley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plpython3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6fa3b6e21002011201x17966bdet839a85719fada341@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plpython3 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plpython3
Re: plpython3 Re: plpython3 Re: plpython3 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On the basis of all of the foregoing, I don't think we can consider > this patch further for this CommitFest and will update > commitfest.postgresql.org accordingly. FWIW, I am very excited about this patch and would be happy to review it but have been very busy over the past month. If I can promise a review by Thursday morning could we keep it active? Hopefully, at the very least, I can provide some useful feedback and spawn some community interest. I am worried that there is a bit of a chicken and an egg problem with this patch. I code nearly exclusively in python and C, but I have often found pl/python to be very unwieldy. For this reason I often use pl/perl or pl/pgsql for problems that, outside of postgres, I would always use python. From the documentation, this patch seems like an enormous step in the right direction. -Nathan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: