Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6ee64972-fc4d-b169-7f25-0940118f59ce@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/9/17 3:45 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > * I think it's worth looking into ucol_nextSortKeyPart(), and using > that as an alternative to ucol_getSortKey(). It doesn't seem any > harder, and when I tested it it was clearly faster. (I think that > ucol_nextSortKeyPart() is more or less intended to be used for > abbreviated keys.) I will try to look into that. > * I think that it's not okay that convert_string_datum() still uses > strxfrm() without considering if it's an ICU build. That's why I > raised the idea of a pg_strxfrm() wrapper at one point. That code works in a locale-agnostic way now, which might be questionable, but it's not the fault of this patch, I think. > * Similarly, I think that check_strxfrm_bug() should have something > about ICU. It's looking for a particular bug in some very old version > of Solaris 8. At a minimum, check_strxfrm_bug() should now not run at > all (a broken OS strxfrm() shouldn't be a problem with ICU). But we'll still be using strxfrm for the database default locale, so we need to keep that check. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: