Re: Non-decimal integer literals
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Non-decimal integer literals |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6e7d5b72-eaa6-e481-71d4-61a0a057949c@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Non-decimal integer literals (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Non-decimal integer literals
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08.12.22 12:16, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 29.11.22 21:22, David Rowley wrote: >> There seems to be a small bug in the pg_strtointXX functions in the >> code that checks that there's at least 1 digit. This causes 0x to be >> a valid representation of zero. That does not seem to be allowed by >> the parser, so I think we should likely reject it in COPY too. >> -- probably shouldn't work >> postgres=# copy a from stdin; >> Enter data to be copied followed by a newline. >> End with a backslash and a period on a line by itself, or an EOF signal. >>>> 0x >>>> \. >> COPY 1 > > Fixed in new patch. I moved the "require at least one digit" checks > after the loops over the digits, to make it easier to write one check > for all bases. > > This patch is also incorporates your changes to the digit analysis > algorithm. I didn't check it carefully, but all the tests still pass. ;-) committed
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: