Re: UUID datatype
| От | ntr |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: UUID datatype |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6e6cc3bc0802160806o6e686b15jbea6cc3e7b36ccbd@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: UUID datatype (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: UUID datatype
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
java.util.UUID and UUID in PG they are different things.
it's better to map THAT to a PGuuid class!
it's better to map THAT to a PGuuid class!
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> wrote:
There aren't any exact plans, but I was thinking we would map the pg uuid
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Andrew wrote:
> I'm wondering about the timeline or plans if any for JDBC driver support of
> the recently added UUID datatype in PostgreSQL?
type onto the java.util.UUID type. The only problem with that
is java.util.UUID only appeared in the 1.5 JDK, so we'd only be
able to support it for some driver versions. Do people think it's better
to always map it to a PGuuid class?
Kris Jurka
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: