Re: [SQL] (Ab)Using schemas and inheritance
От | Tony Wasson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] (Ab)Using schemas and inheritance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6d8daee30605231754s58364cd1o79a6520f203a1734@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [SQL] (Ab)Using schemas and inheritance ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [SQL] (Ab)Using schemas and inheritance
Re: [SQL] (Ab)Using schemas and inheritance |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 5/23/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote: > > Is this a good idea? Would this be too bad, performance-wise, if I had > > thousands of schemas to use like that? Any advice on better approaches? Any > > expected problems? > > One issue is that you'll probably be breaking new ground here a bit; I > suspect there's very few people that are using more than a handful of > schemas. Shouldn't pose any issues, but you never know; although any > issues you do run into should only be performance problems. $.02 about lots of schemas. I worked with an application that had 500 schemas and that worked very well. However, as the number of schemas exceeeded 8000 the query speed started to degrade. Running \d with a single schema in your search path took a few seconds with that many schemas. Queries that were running in 100ms were now taking about 600ms. In short, postgresql will support lots of schemas.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: