Re: Query Jumbling for CALL and SET utility statements
| От | Drouvot, Bertrand |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Query Jumbling for CALL and SET utility statements |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6d0d8a57-0e9c-7fcb-5072-aae544dafa5c@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Query Jumbling for CALL and SET utility statements ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Query Jumbling for CALL and SET utility statements
Re: Query Jumbling for CALL and SET utility statements |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 9/16/22 5:47 PM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/16/22 2:53 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Attached v5 to normalize 2PC commands too, so that we get things like:
>>
>> + case T_VariableSetStmt:
>> + {
>> + VariableSetStmt *stmt = (VariableSetStmt *) node;
>> +
>> + /* stmt->name is NULL for RESET ALL */
>> + if (stmt->name)
>> + {
>> + APP_JUMB_STRING(stmt->name);
>> + JumbleExpr(jstate, (Node *) stmt->args);
>>
>> With the patch, "SET ... TO DEFAULT" and "RESET ..." are counted as
>> the same query.
>> Is this intentional?
>
> Thanks for looking at the patch!
> No, it is not intentional, good catch!
>
>> Which might be ok because their behavior is basically the same.
>> But I'm afaid which may cause users to be confused. For example, they
>> may fail to
>> find the pgss entry for RESET command they ran and just wonder why the
>> command was
>> not recorded. To avoid such confusion, how about appending stmt->kind
>> to the jumble?
>> Thought?
>
> I think that's a good idea and will provide a new version taking care of
> it (and also Sami's comments up-thread).
Please find attached v6 taking care of the remarks mentioned above.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: