Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
От | Konstantin Knizhnik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6c91d4ba-1a77-ba64-39ee-fda26dcfc9bd@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 31.07.2019 19:56, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 09/07/2019 23:59, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: >> Fixed patch version of the path is attached. > > Much of the patch and the discussion has been around the raw parsing, > and guessing which literals are actually parameters that have been > inlined into the SQL text. Do we really need to do that, though? The > documentation mentions pgbouncer and other connection poolers, where > you don't have session state, as a use case for this. But such > connection poolers could and should still be using the extended query > protocol, with Parse+Bind messages and query parameters, even if they > don't use named prepared statements. I'd want to encourage > applications and middleware to use out-of-band query parameters, to > avoid SQL injection attacks, regardless of whether they use prepared > statements or cache query plans. So how about dropping all the raw > parse tree stuff, and doing the automatic caching of plans based on > the SQL string, somewhere in the exec_parse_message? Check the > autoprepare cache in exec_parse_message(), if it was an "unnamed" > prepared statement, i.e. if the prepared statement name is an empty > string. > > (I'm actually not sure if exec_parse/bind_message is the right place > for this, but I saw that your current patch did it in > exec_simple_query, and exec_parse/bind_message are the equivalent of > that for the extended query protocol). > > - Heikki I decided to implement your proposal. Much simple version of autoprepare patch is attached. At my computer I got the following results: pgbench -M simple -S 22495 TPS pgbench -M extended -S 47633 TPS pgbench -M prepared -S 47683 TPS So autoprepare speedup execution of queries sent using extended protocol more than twice and it is almost the same as with explicitly prepared statements. I failed to create regression test for it because I do not know how to force psql to use extended protocol. Any advice is welcome. -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: