Re: Postgres perl module namespace
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgres perl module namespace |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6c33f6e2-659e-04d3-36cd-ec7c94450712@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Postgres perl module namespace (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Postgres perl module namespace
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/10/21 10:13 PM, Mark Dilger wrote: > >> On Aug 10, 2021, at 7:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> >> If we were publishing them on CPAN that would be reasonable. But we're >> not, nor are we likely to, I believe. > I'm now trying to understand the purpose of the renaming. I thought the problem was that RPM packagers wanted somethingthat was unlikely to collide. Publishing on CPAN would be the way to claim the namespace. > > What's the purpose of this idea then? If there isn't one, I'd rather just keep the current names. Yes we want them to be in a namespace where they are unlikely to collide with anything else. No, you don't have to publish on CPAN to achieve that. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: