Re: sleep?
От | Don Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sleep? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6c21003b05082206341411de2d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sleep? (John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: sleep?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Thanks for all of the replies. I recompiled my DB with plperlu and am using perl's sleep function.
I agree that a basic function (non-CPU intensive sleep) like this should be built in.
Thanks again.
-Don
--
Donald Drake
President
Drake Consulting
http://www.drakeconsult.com/
http://www.MailLaunder.com/
http://www.mobilemeridian.com/
312-560-1574
I agree that a basic function (non-CPU intensive sleep) like this should be built in.
Thanks again.
-Don
On 8/21/05, John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com> wrote:
On Aug 21, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Guido Barosio wrote:
> Don't know about such thing, but I guess that a plpgsql function
> could help using datetime var's.
>
> Just a guess, don't know if the optimal solution.
Yes, you can write one in plpgsql using timeofday, but it is horribly
inefficient wastes CPU cycles busy looping. I use the version below
for some simple testing, but it is not useful for a production
system. It would be nice to have a sleep function that does not
require anything beyond plpgsql.
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pgedit.com/
Power Tools for PostgreSQL
create or replace function sleep (integer) returns time as '
declare
seconds alias for $1;
later time;
thetime time;
begin
thetime := timeofday()::timestamp;
later := thetime + (seconds::text || '' seconds'')::interval;
loop
if thetime >= later then
exit;
else
thetime := timeofday()::timestamp;
end if;
end loop;
return later;
end;
' language plpgsql;
--
Donald Drake
President
Drake Consulting
http://www.drakeconsult.com/
http://www.MailLaunder.com/
http://www.mobilemeridian.com/
312-560-1574
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: