Re: CI and test improvements
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CI and test improvements |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6b6c2853-b4e7-b3c5-5090-b882985bceb4@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: CI and test improvements (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CI and test improvements
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 15.03.23 15:56, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I'm surprised if there's any question about the merits of making > documentation easily available for review. Several people have agreed; > one person mailed me privately specifically to ask how to show HTML docs > on cirrusci. > > Anyway, all this stuff is best addressed either before or after the CF. > I'll kick the patch forward. Thanks for looking. I suppose this depends on what you want to use this for. If your use is to prepare and lay out as much information as possible about a patch for a reviewer, some of your ideas make sense. I'm using this primarily to quickly test local work in progress. So I want a quick feedback cycle. I don't need it to show me which HTML docs changed, for example. So maybe there need to be different modes.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: