Re: multiple databases vs multiple clusters on the same host
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: multiple databases vs multiple clusters on the same host |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6afeeedfcdf7ab404c0c16b16b5c5093.squirrel@sq.gransy.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: multiple databases vs multiple clusters on the same host (Eugene Ostrovsky <e79ene@yandex.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: multiple databases vs multiple clusters on the same host
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 28 Září 2013, 21:30, Eugene Ostrovsky wrote: > Thanks for the answer! > > About you questions: > 1. Postgres 9.3 > 2. There are about 30-50 user connections. Actually Only 2 of databases > are used intensively, others only in rare cases. > 3. Hardware is AMD Phenom II X4 965, 8 Gb RAM, 2 SATA2 HDD in software > mirror raid > 4. The reason to switch to multiple clusters is that my software uses > roles (login users and groups) for a single database. There are some > problems with it in case of several databases because in postgres roles > are shared between all the databases in the same cluster. Wouldn't it be easier just setup unique roles for each database? It's much better solution than deploying 10 separate clusters (which you'll learn soon, if you go in this direction). And what are those "some problems" that you mentioned? Seems to me this thread started from the wrong end - setting up multiple clusters instead of tackling the actual problem first. Tomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: