Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6aaa2eff-5c0a-06bb-e988-1a7c39d14ddc@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column (Gilles Darold <gilles@migops.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Op 27-10-2021 om 16:33 schreef Gilles Darold: >> >> - Fix documentation about some sgml tag broken. >> >> >> About ROWTYPE generating an error when SELECT * INTO or RETURNING * INTO >> is used with unexpanded column, I have kept things like that because it >> is the normal behavior. I have checked on others database engine and >> this is the same.1 > > > And finally I found the reason of the diff on compression.out and > collate.linux.utf8.out, new version v5 of the patch attached. > > [ 0001-hidden-column-v5.patch ] This warning during compile from gcc 11.2: pg_dump.c: In function ‘dumpTableSchema’: pg_dump.c:16327:56: warning: comparison of constant ‘0’ with boolean expression is always true [-Wbool-compare] 16327 | if (tbinfo->attisunexpanded[j] >= 0) | ^~ Otherwise, build, make check, chekc-world are OK. Also the pdf builds ok. Thanks, Erik Rijkers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: