Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A75A3@Herge.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? (Miles Keaton <mileskeaton@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> $4000 is not going to get you much disk - If you buy components from > the cheapest source I know (newegg.com) you end up around $5k with > 14x36gig Raptor SATA drives and a 4U chasis with a 14xSATA built in > back plane packing 2x9500S AMCC Escalade RAID cards, which are > supported in Linux, 4Gig RAM and 2xOpteron 242. If you are not CPU > bound, there isn't much point going to 246. If you want SCSI, then > you will be paying more. Check out rackmountmart.com for Chasises, > they have a nice 5U that has a 24xSATA backplane (We will be acquiring > this in the next few weeks). If you really want to go nuts, they have > an 8U with 40xSATA backplane. > > Alex Turner > NetEconomist heh, our apps do tend to be CPU bound. Generally, I think the extra CPU horsepower is worth the investment until you get to the really high end cpus. I definitely agree with all your hardware choices though...seems like you've hit the 'magic formula'. Merlin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: