Re: possible wierd boolean bug?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: possible wierd boolean bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7569@Herge.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | possible wierd boolean bug? ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> That is bizarre. Does EXPLAIN show any difference? Uh oh. esp=# reindex table data1.parts_order_line_file; REINDEX esp=# explain analyze select 1::int4, * from data1.po_line_file esp-# where pol_po_no = '00000002' and esp-# (pol_po_no = '00000002' and pol_po_rel_no = 0) and esp-# (pol_po_no = '00000002' and pol_po_rel_no = 0 and pol_item_no = '1570') esp-# limit 1 ; QUER Y PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- --Limit (cost=0.00..5.76 rows=1 width=313) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=1) -> Index Scan using po_line_file_pkey on po_line_file (cost=0.00..5.76 rows=1 width=313) (actua l time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: ((pol_po_no = '00000002'::bpchar) AND (pol_po_no = '00000002'::bpchar) AND (pol _po_no = '00000002'::bpchar) AND ((pol_po_rel_no)::smallint = 0) AND ((pol_po_rel_no)::smallint = 0) ) Filter: ((pol_item_no)::text = '1570'::text)Total runtime: 0.000 ms (5 rows)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: