Re: win32 pgsql not installable
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: win32 pgsql not installable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB34101AF0A@Herge.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | win32 pgsql not installable (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: win32 pgsql not installable
|
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> Once postgres is available on windows machines I think it will used in a > multitude of applications - some of which are directed towards single > user situations. With the utmost respect I feel postgres needs to run > without issues of the kind presently being presented. On this point I agree with you 100%. PostgreSQL has some features which make it ideal for packaging with an application. I used to work for a company that wrote GIS software which had heavy data requirements. At the time, tho, there was no viable win32 option, now there is. IMO, app + database installations should not install the full server. The application should open a pipe to postgres.exe. (the app could be installed with a pre-bootstrapped database). The problem of course is that means losing the libpq library. Thus, the long term solution is to have libpq/odbc/jdbc interface wrapper access to a standalone backend. These don't exist right now, but perhaps they might one day. In the mean time, we all have to work around this :( Merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: