Re: Prestige users
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prestige users |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB34101AE05@Herge.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Prestige users (Bruce <bruce@centerstage.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> as a followup, here's some more confidence inspiring behaviour from MySQL > (my version is what shipped with RH 7.2, 3.23.41. > > mysql> create table testg (t1 numeric(30,4)); > Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) > > mysql> insert into testg values (12345678901234567890.1234); > Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) > > mysql> select * from testg; > +---------------------------+ > | t1 | > +---------------------------+ > | 12345678901234567168.0000 | > +---------------------------+ Foxpro has a very similar philosophy in design. It will do many awful things to your data, like silently truncate your strings, etc. It's a pretty safe bet that the developers at Bruce's company are quite used to dealing with these issues in application logic code. They are probably also used to fixing busted indexes and repairing data and all the other things that come along with the direct path to the data. Mysql is actually a lot like foxpro in a lot of respects, although it lacks a lot of the programming power of foxpro. Moving to this system will not gain a whole lot by any measure except to allow easy connectivity over the internet. Postgres, OTOH, offers a world of advantages, both technical as well as the PHB type stuff. Merlin
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: