Re: Multi-language to be or not to be

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Monday, February 12, 2007 11:51:34 +0100 Peter Eisentraut 
<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:

> It's one thing to reject web *pages* that are less than 85% or even 100%
> translated.  But no one can require a 85% or 100% translated web *site*.  Not
> even Microsoft or IBM can manage that.

I have to agree with PeterE here ... even 15% shows that we are *attempting* to 
accommodate other languages ... which would hopefully act as encouragement for 
others to submit translations ...

If you expect someone to sit down and translate 85% of the web site into a 
language before we consider it useful, it will never get done ... if we accept 
"one page at a time" so that ppl see their work / effort is being made use of, 
then its less daunting of a project, and more ppl will hopefully get involved 
...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFF0GkQ4QvfyHIvDvMRAl/gAJ40yvI8shS2Qs1v98EDGl1+U5CHZwCgtTqw
z6A+Ve+HKS8Fzq7CShO8/pc=
=a5OQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----