Re: Thread safety
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Thread safety |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6E3A838D-5D51-4460-8EB2-9351C7D9C876@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Thread safety (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Thread safety
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 27 nov 2008, at 13.00, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Can someone remind me why we have --enable-thread-safety? As >>> opposed to >>> it being default and having --disable-thread-safety. >> >> I don't have any numbers or a roster to support this, but I suppose >> that >> thread-safety is not supported on some platforms. So either we'd >> have >> to have diverging defaults or annoy those unsupported platforms >> with a >> mandatory switch. > > We could try switching it for a day and see what happens to the > buildfarm ... that would give us an idea of how many platforms are not > prepared. > +1. It would be very good to have it ok by default if we cab, and that seems luke a good way to see if it's reasonable... /Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: