-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, September 27, 2007 09:15:03 +0100 Dave Page
<dpage@postgresql.org> wrote:
> So you're in the "Don't care what people call the project" camp rather
> than the "We need to change but this is the wrong way" one?
That's the camp I'm in ... although I can't recall ever seeing anyone refer to
it as Postgre, except in this list ... to be totally honest, if I ever *heard*
anyone refer to it as Postgre, I would have most likely assumed that it was a
language issue ... in French, the 's' would have been silent, so someone French
spelling it 'Postgres', would possibly pronounce it Postgre ...
All we should be "promoting" is that it isn't *wrong* to use Postgres ... what
Bruce is advocating is creating more confusion by flip-flopping between names
within the official documentation ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFG+8dc4QvfyHIvDvMRAssIAJ4uTQVw5zFEqeBhaUco5yvnbKIgJwCeJU1k
eddOVQbESEMgEtKNc0EqjYk=
=DlgE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----