Re: PostgreSQL advocacy
От | Jernigan, Kevin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL advocacy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6DA4539A-2E56-4A74-A56E-7D6A1C6AF512@amazon.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL advocacy (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL advocacy
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 3/24/16, 3:09 PM, "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote: >Jernigan, Kevin wrote: >> Disk is only a single point of failure in RAC if you configure non-redundant storage. >> In general, Oracle recommends triple mirroring to protect against disk failures, >> as they have had many experiences over the years where customers with mirrored disks >> would see consecutive disk failures within short periods of time. > >The single point of failure in Oracle RAC is the ASM file system. > >Yours, >Laurenz Albe Only if you misconfigure ASM for RAC: with RAC, an ASM instance will run on every RAC node, and if the ASM instance failson any one node, the RAC instance on that node will go down, but the RAC instances on the other nodes will continueto run - so the database will remain accessible, though with fewer processors available. If you configure ASM to implement at least dual mirroring for storage - and I’m pretty sure Oracle intentionally makes ithard to configure ASM without mirroring - then ASM will continue run through any single disk failure. -KJ
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: