Re: MySQL Blackhole Engine
От | Scott Ribe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL Blackhole Engine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6D1F872F-3BFA-46A8-9735-517F3AD01E95@elevated-dev.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL Blackhole Engine (Deron <fecastle@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Nov 6, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Deron wrote: > Yes, I can't really find a good use case for it. I am meeting with some of them in the next few days to find out exactlywhat they are using it for. If there is a legitimate use case for this, I will forward that information. > > Thanks for the suggestions. I will pass this information along as well if they really need the behavior. From the docs, half a page down: Inserts into a BLACKHOLE table do not store any data, but if the binary log is enabled, the SQL statements are logged (andreplicated to slave servers). This can be useful as a repeater or filter mechanism. Suppose that your application requiresslave-side filtering rules, but transferring all binary log data to the slave first results in too much traffic.In such a case, it is possible to set up on the master host a “dummy” slave process whose default storage engineis BLACKHOLE -- Scott Ribe scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: