Re: EXTRACT Clarification
От | Thomas F.O'Connell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EXTRACT Clarification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6CFBBB90-1269-11D9-8537-000D93AE0944@sitening.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EXTRACT Clarification (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: EXTRACT Clarification
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Ah, so it's really a question of whether the syntactic sugar of CREATE INDEX is considered worthwhile by the developers (rather than a standards compliance issue) because CREATE INDEX is not a part of the SQL spec? Now that I understand what's going on, I don't have a strong preference, but I'd say that either it needs noting in the documentation or it should be added to the grammar. And if it isn't going to hit the grammar for 7.4.x, I'd be happy to supply a doc patch. -tfo On Sep 29, 2004, at 12:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com> writes: >> That seems reasonable, too, although I was interested to learn that >> this (and a few other expressions) weren't actually functions. > > They are functions ... but not from the point of view of the grammar, > which has special productions for them to cope with SQL's whimsical > syntax requirements. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: