Re: JVM crash when select count(*) on large table through JDBC
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JVM crash when select count(*) on large table through JDBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6CA15016-F105-4963-B9B2-3462EA2B3B53@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JVM crash when select count(*) on large table through JDBC ("Andres Olarte" <olarte.andres@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
As Kris said and I said. If your jvm crashes it's a jvm problem. I know people that have queries that take 20 minutes or more... Dave On 22-Feb-08, at 3:39 PM, Andres Olarte wrote: > I know it's the same to count 1 o 20M rows, but it takes much longer > to count 20M. I really don't know much about the internal of the > driver, but maybe some kind of time out? > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Andres Olarte wrote: >> >>> Just did a quick test with synthetic data (20M rows 3 columns: >>> serial, >>> timestamp, and text). And it worked ok both on Java (with driver >>> postgresql-8.1-407.jdbc3.jar) and PgAdmin. >>> >>> Perhaps you could try to build a test case to expose the problem? >> >> From a client perspective, select count(*) should be the same no >> matter >> how many rows there are and what types of columns are in the table, >> so a >> test case won't be helpful. If the JVM is just up and dying, >> that's the >> JVM's fault not a pg issue. >> >> Kris Jurka >> > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: