Re: pg_terminate_backend
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_terminate_backend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35541@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_terminate_backend (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_terminate_backend
Re: pg_terminate_backend |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> >> Since I have a stuck backend without client again, I'll have to > kill > >> -SIGTERM a backend. Fortunately, I do have console access to > that > >> machine and it's not win32 but a decent OS. > >> > >> > > > > You do know that on Windows you can use pg_ctl to send a pseudo > > SIGTERM to a backend, don't you? > The main issue still is that console access id required, on any OS. Yeah. Though for the Windows case only, we could easily enough make it possible to run pg_ctl kill remotely, since we use a named pipe. Does this seem like a good or bad idea? //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: