Re: Best high availability solution ?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35468@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Best high availability solution ? (Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild@freesurf.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> >Since you're a Windows shop, you may already have the > experience (and > >even liceneses perhaps?) to run Microsoft Cluster Service > (part of 2003 > >Enterprise Edition or 2000 Advanced Server). PostgreSQL will > work fine > >with it. Works with shared disks using either fibrechannel or iSCSI. > > Are you sure that will really work? Yes. I have used it. > I thought Postgresql requires shared memory amongst the > processes. Is that not true on the Windows platform? Oh it does. Makes no change. Microsoft Cluster Service is an active/passive failover clustering solutino. PostgreSQL will only be *active* on one node at a time. So shared memory stuff is not affected in any way. (You can make it actiev/active by running two separate postgresql installations on the two nodes, with failover-with-lower-performance, but it's not a load-sharing cluster solution of any time) //Magnus
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: