Re: [Win32] Problem with rename()
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Win32] Problem with rename() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA352BA@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [Win32] Problem with rename() ("Peter Brant" <Peter.Brant@wicourts.gov>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> > Looking at our code, we have the comment: > > /* These flags allow concurrent rename/unlink */ > > (FILE_SHARE_READ | > > FILE_SHARE_WRITE | FILE_SHARE_DELETE), >=20 > > But I'm not sure that those flags actually guarantee that.=20 > They do allow > > concurrent unlink, but not necessarily rename. I read=20 > elsewhere that it > > should work, but can't find backing docs on MSDN. Seems it=20 > works in most > > cases, but perhaps there are some where it doesn't? >=20 > I think there are two different cases involved in rename: >=20 > 1. Someone has a handle for the file-to-be-renamed; > 2. Someone has a handle for the file that is to be deleted=20 > (ie currently > has the name being renamed to). >=20 > If #2 doesn't work then we've got serious problems. I think=20 > though that > #1 can only occur in the context of WAL segment recycling, so we can > probably work around it if that doesn't work. The problem reported here was 1. Nobody had handles to the new filename. I don't think I've seen any reports of issue 2, but most were never researched to this depth (because most were just a case of uninstalling-the-antivirus-to-make-it-work). //Magnus
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: