Re: On what we want to support: infrastructure?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On what we want to support: infrastructure? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FD23@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On what we want to support: infrastructure? ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> > >While you may not have the need to get paying advertisers, I feel > > >that rotating ads of open source projects which use pgsql was an > > >interesting idea, even though it was partly abandoned > during the site restyle. > > > > > >There is a fairly good number of monthly ad impressions (without > > >banners on the home page) and it's just a pity to avoid using them. > > > > Hmmm ... we can re-discuss this. The reason for removing > them is that > > *paid* ads detract from our image as a serious, well > supported, mature > > OSS project. Look for other major OSS projects who run paid ads on > > their home page ... there aren't any. > > > > Now, if we wanted to make those ads exclusively for > PG-supporting OSS > > projects and for major donors to postgresql.org (and I'm talking > > $10,000+ per year here) then it might be worth revisiting. > > +1, especially on the OSS projects front. I think it's very important > for the community for people to see us as a very viable > alternative to MySQL. -1 from me on the concept of banner ads completely. +1 on a prominent way for OSS projects related to PostgreSQL to be visible on our website, but generic banner-ads suck IMHO. For that as well. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: