Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FBAD@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > (I seem to have something funky in my cvs repo in general - doing a > > cvs diff gives me a *huge* diff for files like gram.c that > I thought > > weren't supposed to be in cvs at all. Any ideas on why that > would be? > > (I'm rsync:ing to a local repository and then running against that > > one)) > > Hm, gram.c once was in CVS, years ago ... but I don't know > why you'd be seeing anything about it now. That's kinda what baffles me as well... if I look into my cvs repository directory, it shows only gram.y,v, with gram.c,v in Attic - which seems to make sense. Must be my client that's gone crazy. In fact, mmy output ends up as: Index: src\backend\parser/gram.c =================================================================== RCS file: c:/prog/cvsrepo/pgsql/pgsql/src/backend/parser/Attic/gram.c,v retrieving revision 2.90 diff -c -r2.90 gram.c *** src\backend\parser/gram.c 7 May 1999 01:22:54 -0000 2.90 --- src\backend\parser/gram.c 14 Sep 2006 06:10:08 -0000 So I guess the question is down to why the hell it's looking at the attic file at all. When I run cvs update on it, I get things like: cvs.exe update: Updating src\backend\parser M src\backend\parser/gram.c cvs.exe update: use `cvs.exe add' to create an entry for src\backend\parser/scan.c which is kinda weird, because gram.c is in .cvsignore. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: