Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FB39@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > >>Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, > > >>threading doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this > > >>refers to at all. > > > > > >Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me > > >either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to > > >revert to the old way? > > > > I'd vote for reverting to the old way. Anyone serious about hacking > > should be on both lists. Then why bother with two different lists? If developers need to be on both list (which I beleive they do), and the focus of both lists is developers, then why not just remove one of them and get rid of the problem? //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: