Re: The name of the game
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The name of the game |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FAFB@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The name of the game ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The name of the game
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> >> Cons for PostgreSQL: > >> (Yes I am aware of the Trademark, but it is invalid at this point) > >> > >> 1. Long domain name > > > > It is only 2 more letters... this is a red herring > > Oh.. very valid from a communication point of view. > > Customer (on phone): What what site should I visit? > ME: WWW.postgresql.org > Customer: What? > Me: www.postgres --- ql.org > Customer: Why the ql? > > And yes this does happen. The name by nature of how it is > spelled is difficult to say without confusing someone. Thus > the domain name being longer is relevant. I don't see the relevance of the domainname at all. I type in "postgres.org" and it redirects to "postgresql.org". If the names were reversed, I would assume "postgresql.org" would be redirecting to "postgres.org". (Same could - and should - of course go for .anything, assuming we have access to the domain) So tell your customer whatever seems easiest (yes, that's most likely postgres - that would be even easier than pgsql.org, if we had it, since it's easily pronouncable) and let's have a computer deal with sorting that part out. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: