Re: PgFoundry Move
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PgFoundry Move |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9D3@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PgFoundry Move ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
> My one criteria in all of this, from day one, was that it had > to be FreeBSD based, it has to be redundant with our current > *core* infrastructure ... While this is a very good point, I don't think it should be overstressed. Yes, it's very good to have that type of redundancy. But if it can be built on a different level than the OS, that would be even better. And it *is* a bit of a problem that there are a lot less ppl skilled in FreeBSD. I know personally of several cases where things have been notably delayed because nobody around really *knew* FreeBSD, specifically with jails, good enough. Yes, a lot of things are the same because it's still *nix. And for critical stuff, I know we can page you. And usually, I assume that results in quick action (don't think I've ever had to, really). But at least I don't want to wake you up in the middle of the night for something that's not that urgent. Now, I'm not saying we should necessariliy change anything. I am just saying that this difference in "available knowledge" is something that whould be weighed into discussions like these. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: