Re: Question
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7756@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Question (Alejandro Lemus <alejandro_lemus2003@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> In the past week, one guy of Unix Group in Colombia > say: "Postgrest in production is bat, if the power off in any > time the datas is lost why this datas is in plain files. > Postgrest no ssupport data bases with more 1 millon of records". > Wath tell me in this respect?, is more best Informix as say Both these statements are completely incorrect. Unlike some other "database systems", PostgreSQL *does* survive power loss without any major problems. Assuming you use a metadata journailng filesystem, and don't run with non-battery-backed write-cache (but no db can survive that..) And having a million records is no problem at all. You may run into considerations when you're talking billions, but you can do that as well - it just takes a bit more knowledge before you can do it right. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: