Re: PGDN and Bricolage.
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PGDN and Bricolage. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C76EB@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | PGDN and Bricolage. ("Gevik babakhani" <gevik@xs4all.nl>) |
| Список | pgsql-www |
> > > Rod, > > > > > > > > >>The question is are people willing to use the Bricolage interface > > >>for writing and maintaining articles? > > > > > > > > > I am. And I think others will be to. If the templates > are set up, > > > submitting stuff as a writer is easy. And this is the main point. As long as it's easy, content writers will probably be happy regardless of the tool. They should focus on *content*, and usually that's what they want. As long as the tool is "reasonably like other tools" and doesn't invent something completely new, it shouldn't be ap roblem. > > I would be willing. > > Great. Please forward some content samples and directions on > how to access this Bricolage installation so I can setup the > element blocks and templates. http://techdocs.postgresql.org AFAIK the idea is to migrate all content (checking that it's still current). Check for example "Josh Berkus adventures" (love the title!) //Magnus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: