Re: Where do we need servers?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Where do we need servers? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE476855@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Where do we need servers? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Where do we need servers?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
> > Assuming majordomo2 works the same way majordomo does, it > just keeps > > the list config and subscription options in plain text files. > > Binary, Berkeley DB files for just about everything ... Yikes. That makes things significantly harder, but I'm sure you could do something along the line of a dump on one and restore on the other. > > Then you set up a second MX record pointing to the > secondary machine > > *with a different priority value*. That way mail is only > delivered to > > the secondary machine if the first fails. Notes on this: > > It wouldn't be a backup in the sense of failover if the main > server reboots, only if it totally goes up in smoke, at which > point we'd need to failover the whole VM ... and this needs > to go onto a non-US server, which I've got lined up in the > EU, just haven't had time to move forward with ... Uh, yes it would, wouldn't it? When the server reboots, it stops responding on port 25. At which point a sending mailserver trying to deliver a mail tot he list will switch to using the secondary MX machine (with a higher priority), and deliver through that one. It would not handle new subscriptions etc, but it shuld handle delivery. > > How are these things set up now? I see svr1, 2 and 4 all > handle mail > > for postgresql.org, but do they do anything more than just > queue it up > > until the primary (svr1) is back up? > > Purely queuing ... Ok. That's what I thought. With that solution, mails will not be lost, but we have no delivery during the downtime. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: