Re: Any chance of a merge module?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any chance of a merge module? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE4764C2@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Any chance of a merge module? (Jonathan Barnhart <jdbarnhart@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> What would it take to make the PG installer into a merge > module? I don't have the stuff to build PG so I can't build > the PG install, though I do have Wix. It would make my life > (and anyone else using PG for a specific app) a lot easier if > you guys would allow us to embed the PG install in our own > install. This would let us just pass in the setup info for > the app and let PG install mostly silently. For my app, the > only thing the user needs to see from PG is the license which > is different from the commercial license on the rest of the > product. The rest I can configure from the main install. > Right now the end user has to configure things right and > follow directions, and that leads to tech support issues when > they screw up. I tried using the silent install option on > the main MSI and got all sorts of problems. (Besides, many > Win2k setups with their old MSIexec don't even support a silent > install.) Hi. There is a bunch of things in the installer that currently does not work well when run as MSM. For example, the whole initdb handling. At least that was the case when I last tried it :) We could do a MSM with just the files, but I assume that's not what you're after? So I would recommend the silent install method. What are your problems with that one? I think it's probalby easier to solve those. (Also, what's the problem with the old MSIs? I thought msiexec always supported that?) //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: