Re: Windows server installation
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows server installation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE476422@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Windows server installation ("Simone Giannecchini" <giannecchini@saclantc.nato.int>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Hello! There hasn'e been enough full scale running of postgresql to say that one is significantly better than the other. In my experience they are more or less equal in terms of postgresql, but those are based only on my own runs. Based on that, I wuold strongly suggest 2003 because of all the other things about it that are improved since 2000. //Magnus > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-win32-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-win32-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf > Of Simone Giannecchini > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:35 PM > To: Postgis-Devel (E-mail); Postgis-Users (E-mail); Win 32 > hackers PGSQL (E-mail) > Subject: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Windows server installation > > Hi everybody, I need an advice. > I am planning on installing Postgresql+postgis on a windows > server machine. I would like to hear from you which one is > the best between Windows 2003 server and windows 2000 server > in terms of various issues related to POstgresql or postgis. > Thanks, Simone. > > @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > Ing. Simone Giannecchini > Software Engineer > Cell: +39 348 0064736 > @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ >
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: