Re: postmaster.pid

> > But sure, we don't really care if it's a postmaster. Then
> > OpenProcess() is probably the best way, yes.
>
> Au contraire!!  One of the problems with the Unix
> implementation is that you *can't* tell for sure if the
> target process is a postmaster.  See past discussions about
> how startup occasionally fails because we get fooled by the
> PID mentioned in postmaster.pid now belonging to pg_ctl or
> some other Postgres-owned process.
>
> This is a place where the Windows version can actually be
> better than the Unix one.  Please fix it and stop imagining
> that your charter is to duplicate a particular Unix syscall
> bug-for-bug.

Ok, if you say so :-) I had the general impression we wanted that. But
then let's go with the
send-signal-0-down-the-pipe-and-ignore-it-in-the-backend. :-)

//Magnus