Re: FAT or NTFS on W2k

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: FAT or NTFS on W2k
Дата
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE34BEC7@algol.sollentuna.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на FAT or NTFS on W2k  (chips42 <chips42@adelphia.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers-win32
> Hi,
>     I have been having problems with both the cygwin and the
> native port of postgreSQL. I currently have my hard drive
> formatted as FAT32. Should I convert to NTFS? I have been
> looking at the archives it is encouraged but not prohibited
> if I understand the posts correctly.

Yes, if at all possible you should. On a production server, *make* it
possible.

It's a bit far-fetched to say that is the cause of your problems,
though. We need to know exactly what the problems are (error messages,
what does not work etc) to help with that.

//Magnus

В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Justin Wyer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FAT or NTFS on W2k
Следующее
От: Claudio Natoli
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc