Re: Scaling further up
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Scaling further up |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE34B351@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Scaling further up ("Anjan Dave" <adave@vantage.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> All: > > We have a Quad-Intel XEON 2.0GHz (1MB cache), 12GB memory, running RH9, PG 7.4.0. There's > an internal U320, 10K RPM RAID-10 setup on 4 drives. > > We are expecting a pretty high load, a few thousands of 'concurrent' users executing either > select, insert, update, statments. > What is the next step up in terms of handling very heavy loads? Clustering? I'd look at adding more disks first. Depending on what type of query load you get, that box sounds like it will be very much I/O bound. More spindles = more parallell operations = faster under load. Consider adding 15KRPM disks as well, they're not all that much more expensive, and should give you better performance than 10KRPM. Also, make sure you put your WAL disks on a separate RAIDset if possible (not just a separate partition on existing RAIDset). Finally, if you don't already have it, look for a battery-backed RAID controller that can do writeback-cacheing, and enable that. (Don't even think about enabling it unless it's battery backed!) And add as much RAM as you can to that controller. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: