Re: initdb authentication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: initdb authentication
Дата
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE1716E2@algol.sollentuna.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на initdb authentication  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Список pgsql-patches
> > > Ok, here is another one.
> > >
> > > Doc patches coming up if/when this one is approved.
> >
> > I think this warning is seriously going to annoy me.  Can we do
> > without it?
>
> What if we skip the warning if the user specifically asks for
> 'trust'?
> Would that help?

Uh. That's how it's done. The warning is only printed if you don't
specifically pick a method.

As for the original question, yes, we can of course do without it. But I
think we shouldn't.
I still say people will get a lot less annoyed by this one than for
example the no-run-as-admin on win32. And this is just a *warning* after
all, it will install the database just fine. Or just add "-A trust".

//Magnus


В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: win32 readline
Следующее
От: Andreas Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logfile subprocess and Fancy File Functions