Re: running as a service?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: running as a service? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE17168B@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | running as a service? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
>> What are the current plans regarding running PG as a >service? A wrapper, >> or integrated code? If a wrapper, will it be put in the >core, or done as >> something like a contrib or pgfoundry project? > >IF a wrapper, should be pgfoundry ... *but*, wouldn't integratd by >cleaner? IF it should go to pgfoundry in that case, I'd say it *has* to be integrated :-) *Everybody* on win32 will expect this. No matter if they download source or binaries or MSI installer. If we don't provide it in the main install, people will see that as a major feature lacking that has to be fixed by an external package. As for which - the current code (submitted by Claudio) does an "extra fork/exec" on the postmaster, basically making the postmaster a wrapper for itself (correct me if I remember incorrectly here Claudio - seems the archives.postgresql.org server is down ATM, and I can't find the patch locally). If so, I think it would actualliy be slightly cleaner to have it in a separate binary (that still does all the signal translation we need, of course). But as I think I've said before, I think the two ways are fairly equal overall. But it *has* to go in the main distro. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: