Re: use of OID.Unknown
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: use of OID.Unknown |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6A9030FD-2EB3-4D8C-8A6D-6897EAD27A3A@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: use of OID.Unknown (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: use of OID.Unknown
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
It's my impression that we don't get near the level of testing that the server does. Most people only download whatever we tag as stable. In other words our real testing cycle occurs once a release has been made. This is really a one line change in the code, now how it interacts with the backend is certainly more complex. Dave On 8-Nov-05, at 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes: >> Before we cut an 8.1 stable release, I'd like to revisit the use of >> unknown for strings at a minimum. > > Isn't it *way* too late to be revisiting such questions for 8.1? > > I'd be fairly worried about breaking cases that work conveniently > today. It sounds like something to experiment with during a devel > cycle, not to cram in at the last moment with no field testing. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: