Re: planner/optimizer question
От | Jeff |
---|---|
Тема | Re: planner/optimizer question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 69EF9EF2-9AA2-11D8-A4E1-000D9366F0C4@torgo.978.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: planner/optimizer question ("Gary Doades" <gpd@gpdnet.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: planner/optimizer question
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Apr 30, 2004, at 3:01 AM, Gary Doades wrote: [ pg query plan, etc ] I wonder if other parts of the plan are affecting the speed. I've recently run into a case where a merge join plan was chosen for this query, which took 11 seconds to execute. Forcing it to pick a nested loop join dropped it to 3. (Updating my default_statistics_target to 500 caused the planner to choose nested loop join) So, is the plan really the same? A better comparision query may be a simple "select a from mytable where a between foo and bar" to get an index scan. In that case its a straight up, vanilla index scan. Nothing else getting in the way. -- Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com> http://www.jefftrout.com/ http://www.stuarthamm.net/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: