Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch?
От | Rémi Zara |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 69E533D8-33DE-45AA-84DC-EA6E6D6B3BA8@mac.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why is "osprey" dumping core in REL8_2 branch?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I know the answer :) I tried to find the patch that caused the failure, and when doing so, rechecking a build which had succeeded now failed. So this was an environment problem. The solution was to change the ulimit for data segment size. I hadn't thought of that because I had originally enabled this conf because pg would not otherwise BUILD... Doesn't this mean that there is some place where the return value of malloc is not checked for null ? Regards, Rémi Zara Le 11 mars 07 à 08:32, Tom Lane a écrit : > I wrote: >> Rémi Zara <remi_zara@mac.com> writes: >>> (gdb) info locals >>> block = 0x4395000 >>> chunk = 0x4395010 >>> priorfree = 0x5395020 >>> chunk_size = 16777216 >>> blksize = 70864912 >>> (gdb) p *block >>> $5 = {aset = 0x306d10, next = 0x0, freeptr = 0x5395020 <Address >>> 0x5395020 out of bounds>, endptr = 0x5395020 <Address 0x5395020 >>> out of bounds>} > >> Well, that's pretty dang interesting. If the end of the block is >> indeed >> out of bounds as gdb claims, that'd explain why it crashes right here >> (actually the crash would be induced by the preceding line of code, >> where it tries to store a marker byte). But how can that be, unless >> malloc is completely broken? And if it is, why's it only >> affecting the >> 8.2 branch? I'm confused. > > Whoa ... osprey just went green in the 8.2 branch, following what is > most surely an unrelated patch in vacuum.c. Can anyone explain that? > I distrust gift horses ... > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that > your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: