Re: autovacuum ignore tables
От | Sriram Dandapani |
---|---|
Тема | Re: autovacuum ignore tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6992E470F12A444BB787B5C937B9D4DF060E5C9B@ca-mail1.cis.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | autovacuum ignore tables ("Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani@counterpane.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
I meant to say...rules are used on the parent table to redirect to child. Just like the way the postgres 8.1 documentation has it. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:48 PM To: Sriram Dandapani Cc: Matthew T. O'Connor; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] autovacuum ignore tables "Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani@counterpane.com> writes: > The jdbc inserts go into the main parent table and check constraints > redirect them to child tables. A check constraint can't redirect anything. Are you saying that you use a trigger to try to insert the row into *each* child table, relying on the constraints to make all except one insert fail? Ugh. You'd do a lot better to duplicate the partitioning-rule knowledge in the trigger, and do only one insert that should succeed --- no wasted cycles, and no need for a subtransaction. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: