Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL JDBC and sub-select
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL JDBC and sub-select |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6947.1036906073@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL JDBC and sub-select (snpe <snpe@snpe.co.yu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL JDBC and sub-select
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
snpe <snpe@snpe.co.yu> writes: > I work with JDeveloper and PostgreSQL JDBC and I have one problem. > I get error : > sub-SELECT in FORM must have an alias > Is it SQL standard (must have alias) or PostgreSQL specific ? The SQL standard says you must write an alias. A FROM item is a <table reference> (SQL92 section 7.4), which is defined (in SQL92 6.3) as <table reference> ::= <table name> [ [ AS ] <correlation name> [ <left paren> <derived column list> <right paren> ] ] | <derived table> [ AS ] <correlation name> [ <left paren> <derived column list> <right paren> ] | <joined table> where <derived table> ::= <table subquery> The square brackets show that an alias (<correlation name>) is optional for a plain table name, but is required for a sub-SELECT (<derived table>). This is not just a random whim on the part of the SQL spec writers. One reason why they did it that way is to ensure that some specific <correlation name> can be associated with every column produced by a FROM clause. I used to remember some other interesting consequences, but it's too late on a Saturday night to recall all the details... > I can't change SQL command, but it is internal JDeveloper command I have zero sympathy for "please change Postgres because my application cannot be bothered to comply with the SQL specification". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: